http://dennyhatch.blogspot.com/2019/01/37-most-successful-advertisement-in.html
Posted by Denny Hatch
The Most Successful Advertisement
In the History of the World!
In the History of the World!
Read the 775 Words That Brought in a Staggering $2 Billion
I seriously started collecting junk mail in 1980 and launched the newsletter and archive
service,
WHO’S MAILING WHAT! in 1984. At some
point I took note of a letter that kept coming in to my own mailbox—and was
sent to me by my correspondents around the country—month-after-month-after
month.
“Two Young
Men...” letter was written by freelancer Martin Conroy and first sent out in
1974. It was mailed continuously for over 25 years.
Late in 1991 I phoned THE WALL STREET JOURNAL circulation manager Paul Bell and ran some numbers by him. Transcript:
Late in 1991 I phoned THE WALL STREET JOURNAL circulation manager Paul Bell and ran some numbers by him. Transcript:
HATCH: Would you say that the
average mail order circulation of the Journal
over the past 18 years was about one million?
BELL: [Pause.] Yes, that’s
about right.
HATCH: Am I right in assuming
that the average subscription rate of The
Wall Street Journal over the past 18 years has been about $100 a year?
BELL: [Pause.] Yes, that’s
about right.
HATCH: Is it safe to assume
that 55 percent of all your mail order subscribers over the past eighteen years
have come in as a result of Martin Conroy’s “Two Young Men...” letter?
BELL: We have a lot of other sources—telemarketing,
subscriptions from newsstand sales, gift subscriptions, supermarket take-ones,
inserts. But, yes, I think 55 percent is a fair estimate.
HATCH: Paul, one million subscribers per year times
$100 equals $100 million times 18 years is $1.8 billion times 55 percent equals
$1 billion. If these numbers are correct, the Martin Conroy letter is directly
responsible for bringing in $1 billion in revenues to The Wall Street Journal, and is, therefore THE MOST SUCCESSFUL SINGLE PIECE OF ADVERTISING IN THE HISTORY OF THE
WORLD!
BELL: [Long silence. Then in a small voice.] Uh,
please don’t tell Marty Conroy. He’ll raise his prices.
NOTE: The Two-young men" mailing was control until 2003. This means it brought in an additional $1 billion in the 12 years since this exchange with Paul Bell, during which time the publication no doubt raised its prices. Hence the total revenue of the 775 words in the letter below would be in the neighborhood of $2 billion. That's $25.8 million a word!
NOTE: The Two-young men" mailing was control until 2003. This means it brought in an additional $1 billion in the 12 years since this exchange with Paul Bell, during which time the publication no doubt raised its prices. Hence the total revenue of the 775 words in the letter below would be in the neighborhood of $2 billion. That's $25.8 million a word!
Dear Reader,
On a beautiful late spring afternoon,
twenty-five years ago, two young men graduated from the same college. They were
very much alike, these two young men. Both had been better than average
students, both were personable and both—as young college graduates are—were
filled with ambitious dreams for the future.
Recently, these men returned to their
college for their 25th reunion.
They were still very much alike. Both
were happily married. Both had three children. And both, it turned out, had
gone to work for the same Midwestern manufacturing company after graduation,
and were still there.
But there was a difference. One of
the men was manager of a small department of that company. The other was its
president.
What Made The Difference
Have you ever
wondered, as I have, what makes this kind of difference in people’s lives? It
isn’t that one person wants success and the other one doesn’t.
The difference lies
in what each person knows and how he or she makes use of that knowledge.
And this is why I am
writing to you and to people like you about The Wall Street Journal. For that
is the whole purpose of the Journal: to give its readers knowledge—knowledge
that they can use in business.
A Publication Unlike Any Other
You see, The Wall
Street Journal is a unique publication. It’s the country’s only national
business daily. Each business day, it is put together by the world’s largest
staff of business-news experts.
Each business day,
The Journal’s pages include a broad range of information of interest and
significance to business-minded people, no matter where it comes from. Not
just stocks and finance, but anything and everything in the whole,
fast-moving world of business . . .The Wall Street Journal gives you all the
business news you need—when you need it.
Knowledge Is Power
Right now, I am
reading page one of The Journal, the best-read front page in America. It
combines all the important news of the day with in-depth feature reporting.
Every phase of business news is covered, from articles on inflation, wholesale
prices, car prices, tax incentives for industries to major developments in
Washington and elsewhere.
(over please)
And there is page
after page inside: The Journal, filled with fascination and significant
information that’s useful to you. The Marketplace section gives you
insights into how consumers are thinking and spending. How companies compete
for market share. There is daily coverage of law, technology, media and
marketing. Plus daily features on the challenges of managing smaller companies.
The Journal is also
the single best source for news and statistics about your money. In the Money
& Investing section there are helpful charts, easy-to-scan market
quotations, plus “Abreast of the Market,” “Heard on the Street” and “Your Money
Matters,” three of America’s most influential and carefully read investment
columns.
If you have never
read The Wall Street Journal, you cannot imagine how useful it can be to you.
Save $30 On Your Subscription
Put our statements
to the proof by subscribing for a full year right now and save $30 off
the regular subscription price. That’s right, order now and you can receive The
Journal for an entire year for $99.
Or if you prefer, a
13-week subscription is only $34. It’s a perfect way to get acquainted with The
Journal. Either way—one year or 13 weeks—we pay the delivery costs.
Simply fill out the
enclosed order card and mail it in the postage-paid envelope pro-vided. And
here’s The Journal’s guarantee: should The Journal not measure up to your
expectations, you may cancel this arrangement at any point and receive a refund
for the undelivered portion of your subscription.
If you feel as we do
that this is a fair and reasonable proposition, then you will want to find out
without delay if The Wall Street Journal can do for you what it is doing for
millions of readers. So please mail the enclosed order card now, and we will
start serving you immediately.
About those two
college classmates I mention at the beginning of this letter: they were
graduated from college and together got started in the business world. So what
made their lives different?
Knowledge. Useful
knowledge. And its application.
An Investment In Success
I cannot promise you
that success will be instantly yours if you start reading The Wall Street
Journal. But I can guarantee that you will find The Journal always interesting,
always reliable, and always useful.
Peter R.
Kann
Publisher
PRK:eu
Encs.
P.S. It's important to note that The Journal's subscription may be tax deductible.
Ask your tax advisor.
PRK:eu
Encs.
P.S. It's important to note that The Journal's subscription may be tax deductible.
Ask your tax advisor.
© 1991
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Observations About People and Copywriting
By Martin Conroy
If you’re trying to find
out what makes people tick, you might take a look at the Seven Deadly Sins from
the old Baltimore Catechism.
Remember them? Pride,
covetousness, lust, anger, gluttony, envy and sloth. Of course, the deadly sins
are all bad and all extreme and all no-nos.
But there’s an unsinful,
unextreme side to every one of them where you can see how good and honest
people act and react:
• On the sunny side of
sinful pride, for example, nice people still take normal, unsinful satisfaction
in what they are and what they have.
• Short of deadly
covetousness, people have an understandable desire to possess some of the good
things in life.
• Instead of sinful lust,
there’s good old love that makes the world go ‘round.
• Without raging in
anger, good people can still feel a reasonable annoyance with bad people and
bad things.
• Without getting into
gross gluttony, normal men and women can have a normal appetite for good food
and drink.
• Short of envy, there’s
a very human yen to do as well as the next guy.
• And as for sloth, who
isn't happy to learn an easier way to do things.
• The Seven Deadly Sins.
If you want to know what makes people act like people, they’re worth a look.
Martin Conroy, 84, Ad Writer Famous for a
Mail Campaign Is Dead
By MARGALIT FOX DEC. 22, 2006
Martin Conroy, an advertising executive who without recourse to glossy paper or fancy graphics created one of the most enduring ad campaigns of all time, died on Tuesday in Branford, Conn. He was 84 and lived in Madison, Conn., and Captiva, Fla.
The cause was complications of lung cancer, his son Martin Peter Conroy said.
Mr. Conroy’s masterwork never appeared in newspapers or magazines. Nor was it broadcast on television or the radio. It was a letter — a simple, two-page letter. It begins:
“On a beautiful late spring afternoon, twenty-five years ago, two young men graduated from the same college. They were very much alike, these two young men. Both had been better than average students, both were personable and both — as young college graduates are — were filled with ambitious dreams for the future.”
Then, a small note of foreboding:
“Recently, these men returned to their college for their 25th reunion.”
Mr. Conroy’s letter is a subscription pitch for The Wall Street Journal. Written in plain language with the inexorable pull of a fairy tale, the letter is widely considered a classic of direct-mail marketing, sent to millions of people in the course of nearly three decades.
Although The Journal kept no statistics on the letter’s effectiveness, its sheer longevity, direct-mail experts say, is its own best testament. With minor variations, Mr. Conroy’s letter was in continuous use for 28 years, from 1975 to 2003.
“It’s the ‘Hamlet,’ the ‘Iliad,’ the ‘Divine Comedy’ of direct-mail letters,” James R. Rosenfield, a direct-marketing consultant in New York and San Diego, said in a telephone interview this week. “It’s had a longer life, to my knowledge, than any other direct mail in history.”
Alan Rosenspan, the president of Alan Rosenspan Associates, a direct-marketing concern in Newton, Mass., uses Mr. Conroy’s letter as a teaching tool in seminars.
“I ask people to read out loud the first paragraph of the letter,” Mr. Rosenspan said by telephone. “And what’s astonishing to me is that they never stop at the first paragraph. They keep on reading. And I tell them: ‘You have just proven why this letter’s so powerful. It’s a story.’ ”
The direct marketer’s task is to reel readers in — gently, firmly, imperceptibly — and keep them reading, despite the looming maw of the wastebasket. Mr. Conroy’s letter does so by spinning the hypnotic story of two young lives fatefully diverging. Here is what comes next:
“They were still very much alike. Both were happily married. Both had three children. And both, it turned out, had gone to work for the same Midwestern manufacturing company after graduation, and were still there.
“But there was a difference. One of the men was manager of a small department of that company. The other was its president.”
Strikingly, the letter nowhere says that the man who made good read The Journal. But the message is resoundingly there, between the lines.
“It doesn’t start off by saying, ‘Be rich beyond your wildest dreams and dominate your fellow human beings,’ ” Mr. Rosenfield said. “But the very obvious, palpitating subtext — it’s barely even a subtext — is greed and envy. So it’s a lovely combination of a hard-sell letter nested inside a kind of soft shell.”
Martin Francis Conroy was born in Manhattan on Dec. 13, 1922. In 1943, he earned a bachelor’s degree in English from the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass., and afterward served with the Army in Germany. He worked as a copywriter at Bloomingdale’s and on the editorial staff of Esquire magazine before joining BBDO in 1950; he later became a vice president there. He left the agency in 1979 to work as an independent consultant.
Mr. Conroy is survived by his wife, the former Joan Crowley, whom he married in 1949; eight children, Ellen McNamara, of Stamford, Conn.; Janice Albert, of Seattle; Martin Peter, of Hong Kong; John, of Manhattan; Thomas, of South Orange, N.J.; Dennis, of Darien, Conn.; James, of Fairfield, Conn.; and David, of New Milford, Conn.; a sister, Ellen Gruppo, of Darien; and 14 grandchildren.
Besides The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Conroy’s other accounts at BBDO included The Boston Globe, General Electric, Sheraton and Tupperware. But more than anything else, it was the Journal letter that made him storied in his field.
“I have won 20 direct-marketing Echo Awards,” said Mr. Rosenspan, referring to the international award given annually by the Direct Marketing Association, an industry group. He added:
“I would trade all of them to have written this letter.”
###
Takeaway to Consider
• Direct marketing guru Axel Andersson did the obvious arithmetic and discovered $2 billion divided by 775 words equals $2.58 million per word. "I can't imagine any other literary work in history making that much money unless, perhaps, the Bible." He added, "And that took 2000 years."
• Over the 28-year lifespan of the "Two Young Men..." letter, scores of freelance copywriters and agencies were paid thousands of dollars by The Wall Street Journal in attempts to beat this fabled control. It supposedly lost to an occasional test effort now and then according to rumors. But like Cisco Houston's wonderful folk song, The Cat Came Back, the two young men kept showing up in the WHO'S MAILING WHAT! archive until 2003.
Specifications of the Mailing
•
Outside Envelope: 4" x 7-1/2," one color (black), glassine window
lower right.• Letter: 7" x 10-1/2", two-over-one (all black with Kann signature in blue on back).
• Order Card: 3-1/2" x 7," two color with detachable Guarantee.
P.S. This past week I emailed Paul Bell and asked how The Wall Street Journal paid its circulation copywriters. Paul’s reply:
Denny:
The
letter “Two Young Men,” was in use as the control mailing during the late 1970s
and early 1980s, when I arrived in the WSJ circulation department. Marty
Conroy, who at one time was a regular copywriter at BBDO and later went out on
his own, was on an annual retainer. I don’t recall the annual fee we paid to
him.
The
ballpark fee in the late 70s and early 80s was small by today’s standards, as I
recall it. I can’t say for certain, but $5,000 seems to stick out in my mind
... and a smaller fee paid to tinker with the letter for subsequent test
mailings. Notwithstanding this, remember that Marty was on a retainer and
didn’t get the per-letter fee. Later on, perhaps it was 1990 or so, the
retainer ended, but Marty stayed as a regular contributor for Barron’s and the
Journal. We evolved to paying Marty per letter, thus my comment, “Don’t tell
Marty or he’ll raise his price.”
I
can emphatically say that at the Journal we bought the unlimited rights to each
direct-mail letter and didn’t pay any performance bonuses.
I’m
so glad you included the obituary written by Margalit Fox. She was masterful,
and went through several phone calls with me to be sure she got the fine points
down correctly. It was a masterful tribute to a genuinely good man.
And
finally - - the Seven Deadly Sins. Marty said all of life’s foibles and
vagaries could be traced to at least one of them.
All
the best,
###
Word count: 2600
Denny, how does this compare to the "this is not for everyone" letter AMEX used to send out?
ReplyDeleteThanks for taking the time to write. I remember the "not for everyone" letter. It was mailed many times. But did it last 28 years? My bet is no. Further, WSJ was roughly $100/year. AMEX credit card was what? $30 to $50 a year? Plus of course AMEX got a small % of the member's spend. I have been a member since '64 (sic). Back then I spent maybe $100/month. Later maybe $1000 a month. In short, $ accountability on a credit card promotion is basically impossible. Finally, AMEX had dozens of tests, versions, offers. The Conroy letter was the same offer (with price increases) year after year.
ReplyDeleteI am writing this under my nom de guerre, lest something I say offend colleagues who occasionally throw a bone of an assignment my way. That stated, I have two points two make:
ReplyDelete1) One of the things this story illustrates is why copywriters need a union. If Denny's reckoning is correct, Conroy's letter produced about $2 billion worth of revenue for which, over the years, he earned a cumulative retainer of $140,000 in annual dribbles of $5,000. And he was one of the rare copywriters who could even demand a retainer. Most would have ended up taking a $5,000 flat fee and disappearing into oblivion.
How could a union change this? Hollywood screenwriters have one. Each author of a script earns not only a fee, but residuals based on continued use in television and other media. When there are several authors (as happens often in advertising) each gets a proportionate share of the years of cash flow he has created. Actors on our TV spots enjoy the same benefits. But the copywriters?
A copywriter at an agency today might come in, collect his day's pay, and get fired the next morning while his work continues to earn ongoing profits for both his agency and the advertiser.
Many decades ago, when I was still a very young copywriter, I brought up the subject of organizing a union with some of my fellow copywriters. Their response? "Oh no, unions are for blue collar people. We're professionals." Professional suckers, if you ask me.
2) A partial answer to "Unknown's" query (above): The actual first sentence of the famous American Express Card letter, was: "Quite frankly, the American Express Card is not for everyone." I can't tell you how many years it ran (at least ten, though) or how much revenue it produced for American Express, but there is a story to go with the letter.
Its author was a brilliant guy named Bill Trembath, now deceased. The letter's success (at an agency then called Ogilvy Direct), and that of other less celebrated works of Trembath that nevertheless beat the pants off various controls did not results in his rising to what David Ogilvy called "The top of the tree."
On the contrary, Trembath career took him just so far, and then a bunch of less talented young Turks pushed him out, while celebrating their own flashier, if less effective work. Trembath, in the end, finished his career working for an obscure ad agency in New Jersey.
Advertising enabled him to make a more-or-less comfortable living, while others stole his glory, made bigger bucks, and eventually lost the account, all the while congratulating themselves on their brilliance.
Which again is why copywriters need a union.
Yours crankily,
The New York Crank
Hey Peter,
DeleteThanks for taking the time with your grand, thoughtful comment!
I especially appreciate the story of Bill Trembath and the AMEX letter.
The world of an advertising copywriter ain’t that of a Hollywood screenwriter. M’oom pitichas represent huge outlays of money for writing, production and promotion. The writing is long form—1-1/2 to 3-or-more hours of finished copy—weeks of total dedication—plus fixes all the way along during production. For example, check out the story of Julius and Theo Epstein and Howard Koch and the writing of Casablanca. They were writing all night so actors could shoot the following morning. A crazed nightmare. They had no idea how to end the film. Finally during the film editing process the ending came to them. The patched in a scene of Bogart and Raines from a prior shoot in the fog and had them deliver the “beginning of a beautiful friendship….” exchange in the recording studio.
In comparison, advertising copy is a wham-bam-thank-you-ma’am exercise. As I recall, Jayme-Ratalahti averaged a week of work. Bill had bills to pay and never wanted a performance bonus. As I recall, they got $25,000 a package or something like that.
Furthermore, the results of copywriters’ work is generally secret giving clients the opportunity to lie about any success.
David Ogilvy’s solution for rewarding copywriters was encouraging them to moonlight.
Memo to Directors
From: David Ogilvy
Date: January 17, 1973
WE ENCOURAGE MOONLIGHTING, PARTICULARLY AMONG OUR COPYWRITERS.
It gives them experience.
It gives them more sense of responsibility.
It increases their income—at no cost to us.
I learned this dodge from Dr. Gallup. He paid us miserably, but encouraged us to moonlight.
Rosser Reeves did a lot of it. So did I.
One year I made more—far more—moonlighting than I did at the agency. And it sharpened my wits.
Anyone who opposes moonlighting is a pettifogger.
Only two rules. Chaps must not moonlight on competing accounts or for other agencies, and they must not be caught doing the work in office hours.
Thanks again for writing, Peter.
Do keep in touch!
Good afternoon, Denny!
ReplyDeleteYou have whetted my appetite: Do you know what the new control was after 2003? Must have been awfully good! And is it still the control?
Best regards!
Tim Orr
Hi Tim,
ReplyDeleteGreat question! I was the archivist of Who's Mailing What! until mid-2017. The Conroy letter was beaten by a voucher package - and a real bare-bones one at that. But it didn't last long, about 2 years according to my records. Different variations followed that added a very short (3-4 paragraph) bland letter to the form. In the last few years, color images were added.
On the other hand, other mailers have "stolen smart" from the Conroy letter, and to this day, use its basic "2 young men" premise to successfully acquire customers and subscribers. Please reach out if you'd like to know more!
Best,
Paul
Paul, Thank you, thank you for taking the time for a reply to long-time subscriber Tim Orr. I was under deadline and you are the only guy in the world (apart from Paul Bell) who would know the answer to Tim's question. The "Professional Voucher" discount format put a lot of copywriters out of business for a couple of years. As I recall it was a single slip of official-looking paper and a BRE (business reply envelope). In the words of the canary in the coal mine: "Cheap, Cheap, Cheap!" The other cheap rival to the full-dress direct mail package was the double postcard. Maybe I'll do a post on postcards. Thanks again.
DeleteDenny, I must have three or four of those "two friends mailings" in my files. Brilliant.
ReplyDeleteArmando, thank you for taking the time to write. I have one copy of the original Conroy mailing. Alas I was sloppy tearing it open and so had to recreate the envelope to post in the blog. For the serious collector, this thing is a rare treasure—like a Rembrandt lithograph—probably worth framing. "What is THAT???" a dinner guest would ask. Your reply:: "The most successful advertisement in the history of the world—775 words that brought in $2 billion." A conversation starter. Cheers.
DeleteHi Denny,
ReplyDeleteThis hasn't been brought up yet, but there's a secret behind this letter.
Conroy appears to have gotten his inspiration from a previous salesletter. (Something all great copywriters do in order to create powerful copy.)
He got his inspiration from an ad for the The Alexander Hamilton Institute from 1919 was written legendary copywriter Bruce Barton.
It was a letter with the headline "The Story of Two Men Who Fought in the Civil War" and you can see the letter in PDF formet here: http://rayedwards.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/bruce_barton_civil_war_ad-1.pdf
But this is where things get interesting.
You see, Barton didn't come up with his idea out of thin air either.
He got his inspiration from a salesletter that was written in 1918. The salesletter was written sell a memory course, the Roth Memory Course.
The headline for that letter is "Earns $30,000 a Year Because of His Memory" and you can see that letter in PDF format here: http://rayedwards.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Roth_Memory_ad_1918.pdf
That means that the most successful advertisement in the world was inspired from a letter that was written just over 100 hundred years ago!
(IMPORTANT: I originally found this information in a great post from Ray Edwards that you can see here: https://rayedwards.com/the-most-successful-sales-letter-youve-never-heard-of/ He believes that the memory letter got its inspiration from an ever more ancient story.)
I just wanted to bring it up as encouragement to anyone reading this.
The next "greatest advertisement in history of the world" might come from one of us reading this post - if we're wise enough to get inspiration from past great advertisements and put our own creativity into it.
Take care, Denny!
Scott Aughtmon
https://recessionsolution.com/